Landlord Wins Long-Running Rent-2-Rent Court Battle
The Supreme Court has ended a long-running case of tenants chasing a landlord of an unlicensed shared house for compensation through a rent repayment order.
The tenants finally ended legal recourse when Britain’s most senior court judges rejected their case.
The ruling in Rakusen v Jepson [2023] UKSC 9 means that a superior landlord is not liable for rent repayment order claims based on the failures of a rent-to-rent landlord.
The court battle started in May 2016, when Rakusen leased a London flat to Kensington Property Investment Group Ltd (KPIG).
KPIG sublet the flat as a house in multiple occupation to three tenants for a total rent of £2,297 a month but failed to licence the property.
In 2019, the tenants started proceedings for a £26,140 rent repayment order because Rakuten had not licenced the flat as an HMO, even though he had leased the home to KPIG, who arranged and managed the letting.
A series of tribunal and court cases followed, culminating at the Supreme Court.
“The Supreme Court unanimously dismisses the appeal. It holds that a Rent Repayment Order cannot be made against a superior landlord,” says the ruling.
Subscribers get full access to exclusive content, including forms, articles and discounts, plus our time saving Tenancy Builder tool.
Signup for our free weekly digest and get the latest news and guidance straight to your inbox (some content requires a paid subscription).